Evidence Level
Moderate
5 Clinical Trials
4 Documented Benefits
3/5 Evidence Score

N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a modified form of the amino acid cysteine. The body uses cysteine to make glutathione, an antioxidant produced inside cells, which is the main reason NAC is studied. In people with chronic bronchitis or COPD, 600 mg twice daily for a year cut flare-ups in two trials, while 600 mg once daily for three years did not, and a Cochrane review of mucolytics as a group found a small reduction in flare-ups. Smaller trials have looked at semen quality, ovulation and depressive symptoms, all in people with a diagnosed condition. In hospitals, high-dose NAC is the antidote for acetaminophen poisoning, a drug use rather than a supplement use. The FDA considers NAC excluded from the dietary supplement definition because it was approved as a drug in 1963, but under August 2022 guidance it is using enforcement discretion, so NAC supplements remain on sale.

Studied Dose 600 to 1,200 mg per day (600 mg once or twice daily) in lung and fertility trials; 2,000 to 3,000 mg per day in mood trials, taken in divided doses
Active Compound N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine (NAC)

Benefits

Antioxidant Support

NAC supplies cysteine, a building block of the antioxidant glutathione. In a 3-month trial in 120 men with unexplained infertility, 600 mg a day raised total antioxidant capacity and lowered oxidative stress markers versus placebo, and in a transplant trial oral NAC lowered reactive oxygen species in bone marrow cells. Effects in healthy people were not measured.

Respiratory Health and airway mucus clearance

NAC is classed as a mucolytic, a medicine believed to make mucus thinner and easier to cough up. In people with COPD, 600 mg twice daily for a year reduced flare-ups in a 1,006-person manufacturer-funded trial and a 120-person trial, but 600 mg once daily for 3 years had no effect in a 523-person trial. A Cochrane review of 38 mucolytic trials found a small reduction in flare-ups.

Mood and mental well-being support

In 75 adults with bipolar disorder on usual medication, 2 g a day of NAC for 24 weeks improved depression ratings versus placebo, but did not delay the next mood episode, and the gains faded after stopping. In 44 adults with OCD, 3 g a day for 16 weeks did not improve the main symptom score. NAC is not a substitute for psychiatric care.

Semen quality and ovulation support

In 120 men with unexplained infertility, 600 mg a day for 3 months improved semen volume, motility and viscosity versus placebo, but not sperm count or shape. In women with PCOS, a meta-analysis of eight trials (910 women) found higher odds of ovulation and pregnancy than placebo but lower than metformin, with no change in insulin, testosterone or BMI. Several of those trials had a high risk of bias.

Mechanism of action

1

Glutathione Precursor

NAC provides cysteine, a building block the body uses to make glutathione, an antioxidant produced inside cells.

2

Mucolytic Action

Mucolytics are believed to reduce the thickness of mucus so it is easier to cough up. NAC is one of the mucolytics pooled in the Cochrane review of people with chronic bronchitis or COPD.

3

Glutamate Modulation

NAC is thought to change glutamate release in parts of the brain by acting on the cystine-glutamate antiporter. This is the proposed rationale for the psychiatric trials, not a demonstrated effect in people who are well.

4

Acetaminophen antidote (hospital use)

In an analysis of 2,540 acetaminophen overdoses, oral NAC at 140 mg per kg, then 70 mg per kg every 4 hours for 17 doses, protected against liver damage when started within 8 hours. For a 70 kg adult the first dose alone is close to 10 grams. This is emergency drug treatment, not a reason to take NAC with acetaminophen at home.

5

Anti-Inflammatory Effects

Reviews describe anti-inflammatory activity alongside NAC's antioxidant effects.

Clinical trials

1
NAC in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: 16-Week RCT
PubMed

Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial of NAC 3 g/day (1.5 g twice daily) for 16 weeks; primary outcome the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS). (Sarris et al. 2015, CNS Drugs)

44 adults aged 18 to 70 with DSM-5 diagnosed OCD.

Null primary outcome: YBOCS total score did not differ from placebo (p = 0.39; per-protocol p = 0.15). The compulsions subscale favored NAC at week 12 but not week 16. Responders: 20% on NAC vs 27% on placebo. Heartburn was more common with NAC.

2
Oral NAC After Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplant: Phase 3 RCT
PubMed

Open-label phase 3 trial: patients aged 15 to 60 with acute leukemia at high risk by a bone marrow endothelial cell marker were randomized 2 to 1 to oral NAC prophylaxis or none; 105 lower-risk patients were followed for comparison. Primary outcome: poor graft function or prolonged low platelets at day 60. (Wang et al. 2022, BMC Med)

120 randomized high-risk transplant patients, plus 105 lower-risk patients.

Poor graft function or prolonged low platelets occurred in 7.5% with NAC vs 22.5% without (hazard ratio 0.317, P = 0.021). Reactive oxygen species in marrow cells fell with NAC. Serious infections were similar (24% vs 25%). Open-label hospital supportive care, not general supplement use.

3
High-Dose NAC in Stable COPD: HIACE 1-Year RCT
PubMed

Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of NAC 600 mg twice daily for 1 year at one Hong Kong hospital. Outcomes: lung function, breathlessness, quality of life, 6-minute walk, flare-ups. (Tse et al. 2013, Chest)

120 adults aged 50 to 80 with stable COPD.

Small airway flow (P = .037) and forced oscillation measures improved, and flare-ups fell (0.96 vs 1.71 per year, P = .019). Breathlessness, quality of life and walking distance did not differ from placebo. One author worked for Zambon, an NAC maker. No major adverse effects.

4
NAC 600 mg Twice Daily for COPD Flare-Ups: PANTHEON RCT
PubMed

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial at 34 hospitals in China; NAC 600 mg twice daily for 1 year; primary outcome annual flare-up rate. Funded by Hainan Zambon Pharmaceutical. (Zheng et al. 2014, Lancet Respir Med)

1,006 adults aged 40 to 80 with moderate-to-severe COPD.

Flare-ups were 1.16 vs 1.49 per patient-year (risk ratio 0.78, p = 0.0011). Adverse events were similar: 29% with NAC vs 26% with placebo.

5
NAC 600 mg Daily for COPD: BRONCUS 3-Year RCT
PubMed

Randomized placebo-controlled trial at 50 centers; NAC 600 mg once daily for 3 years; primary outcomes yearly FEV1 decline and flare-ups per year. (Decramer et al. 2005, Lancet)

523 adults with COPD.

Null: FEV1 decline (54 vs 47 mL per year) and flare-ups (1.25 vs 1.29 per year, p = 0.85) did not differ from placebo. A subgroup analysis suggested fewer flare-ups in people not using inhaled corticosteroids. The authors concluded NAC was ineffective at this dose.

Side effects and drug interactions

Common Potential side effects

In trials, adverse events were generally similar to placebo (29% vs 26% in a 1-year trial at 1,200 mg a day)
Heartburn was more common than with placebo in a 16-week trial at 3 g a day
Intravenous NAC given with intravenous nitroglycerin caused symptomatic low blood pressure in a hospital trial

Important Drug interactions

Nitroglycerin and other nitrates: NAC strengthens nitrate-induced blood vessel widening; combined intravenous use caused symptomatic low blood pressure in a hospital trial. Do not combine without medical supervision
Cancer treatment: ask your oncology team before using antioxidant supplements such as NAC during chemotherapy or radiation

Frequently asked questions about NAC (N-Acetylcysteine)

How much NAC should I take?

Trials have used 600 mg once or twice daily for lung and fertility outcomes and 2 to 3 g a day in mood trials, usually split into two doses. Higher amounts are used in hospitals under supervision. Check with your doctor first, especially if you take nitrate heart medicine.

What is NAC used for?

NAC supplies cysteine for the body's own antioxidant, glutathione. It is classed as a mucolytic, and trials in people with COPD found fewer flare-ups at 600 mg twice daily but not at 600 mg once daily. Nearly all NAC research was done in people with a diagnosed condition, so results may not apply to healthy people.

Should I take NAC with food?

Trials did not compare taking NAC with or without food. If it upsets your stomach, taking it with a meal is a reasonable thing to try.

Are there any cautions with NAC?

In trials NAC was generally tolerated about as well as placebo, though heartburn was more common at 3 g a day. It can strengthen the blood-pressure-lowering effect of nitrate heart medicines. In the US, the FDA considers NAC a drug ingredient but allows supplements to stay on sale under an enforcement discretion policy.

What is NAC?

N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a modified form of the amino acid cysteine. The body uses cysteine to make glutathione, an antioxidant produced inside cells, which is the main reason NAC is studied.

What is the recommended dosage of NAC?

The clinically studied dose is 600 to 1,200 mg per day (600 mg once or twice daily) in lung and fertility trials; 2,000 to 3,000 mg per day in mood trials, taken in divided doses Always follow the product label and check with a healthcare provider for personal advice.

Is NAC safe, and does it have side effects?

For most healthy adults, NAC is well tolerated at studied doses. Reported effects can include: In trials, adverse events were generally similar to placebo (29% vs 26% in a 1-year trial at 1,200 mg a day) Heartburn was more common than with placebo in a 16-week trial at 3 g a day It may also interact with some medications. NAC is not right for everyone, so check with a healthcare provider first if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a medical condition, or take prescription medication.

Does NAC interact with any medications?

Possible interactions include: Nitroglycerin and other nitrates: NAC strengthens nitrate-induced blood vessel widening; combined intravenous use caused symptomatic low blood pressure in a hospital trial. If you take prescription medication, check with a pharmacist or doctor before using it.

How strong is the scientific evidence for NAC?

NutraSmarts rates the evidence for NAC as Moderate (3 out of 5). It is backed by 5 clinical trials and 14 cited references summarized on this page. A higher rating reflects more, larger, and better-designed human studies.

References(14 citations)

Evidence ratings on NutraSmarts are based on the totality of human clinical research, with emphasis on randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews. The references below directly support claims made throughout this page.

  1. Smilkstein MJ, Knapp GL, Kulig KW, Rumack BH. Efficacy of oral N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of acetaminophen overdose. Analysis of the national multicenter study (1976 to 1985). N Engl J Med. 1988;319(24):1557-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812153192401.PubMedUsed to support: National multicenter analysis of 2,540 acetaminophen overdoses: oral NAC (140 mg/kg loading, then 70 mg/kg every 4 hours for 17 doses) was protective regardless of initial plasma acetaminophen level when started within 8 hours, with efficacy falling with delay; the 72-hour oral regimen was as effective as the 20-hour intravenous regimen and possibly better when treatment was delayed. Emergency drug treatment, not supplementation.
  2. Decramer M, Rutten-van Mölken M, Dekhuijzen PN, Troosters T, van Herwaarden C, Pellegrino R, van Schayck CP, Olivieri D, Del Donno M, De Backer W, Lankhorst I, Ardia A. Effects of N-acetylcysteine on outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Bronchitis Randomized on NAC Cost-Utility Study, BRONCUS): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9470):1552-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66456-2.PubMedUsed to support: BRONCUS: 523 patients with COPD at 50 centers, NAC 600 mg/day vs placebo for 3 years. Yearly FEV1 decline and exacerbations (1.25 vs 1.29 per year, hazard ratio 0.99, p = 0.85) did not differ. A subgroup analysis suggested fewer exacerbations in patients not taking inhaled corticosteroids. The authors concluded NAC is ineffective at preventing lung function decline and exacerbations in COPD.
  3. Berk M, Copolov DL, Dean O, Lu K, Jeavons S, Schapkaitz I, Anderson-Hunt M, Bush AI. N-acetyl cysteine for depressive symptoms in bipolar disorder--a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;64(6):468-75. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.04.022.PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind placebo-controlled RCT in 75 people with bipolar disorder in the maintenance phase: NAC 1 g twice daily added to usual medication improved MADRS depression scores over 24 weeks (mean difference -8.05, p = .002) and most secondary scales. Time to a mood episode was unchanged (p = .968), improvements were lost after a 4-week washout, and adverse events did not differ.
  4. Dean O, Giorlando F, Berk M. N-acetylcysteine in psychiatry: current therapeutic evidence and potential mechanisms of action. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2011;36(2):78-86. doi: 10.1503/jpn.100057.PubMedUsed to support: Narrative review of NAC in psychiatry, covering addiction, compulsive and grooming disorders, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder; describes possible glutamatergic, neurotropic and inflammatory actions beyond glutathione. A review, not a trial.
  5. Zheng JP, Wen FQ, Bai CX, Wan HY, Kang J, Chen P, Yao WZ, Ma LJ, Li X, Raiteri L, Sardina M, Gao Y, Wang BS, Zhong NS. Twice daily N-acetylcysteine 600 mg for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (PANTHEON): a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(3):187-94. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70286-8.PubMedUsed to support: PANTHEON: 1,006 patients aged 40 to 80 with moderate-to-severe COPD at 34 Chinese hospitals, NAC 600 mg twice daily vs placebo for 1 year: exacerbations 1.16 vs 1.49 per patient-year (risk ratio 0.78, p = 0.0011), especially in moderate disease. Adverse events 29% vs 26%. Funded by Hainan Zambon Pharmaceutical, an NAC manufacturer.
  6. Sarris J, Oliver G, Camfield DA, Dean OM, Dowling N, Smith DJ, Murphy J, Menon R, Berk M, Blair-West S, Ng CH. N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) in the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A 16-Week, Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Study. CNS Drugs. 2015;29(9):801-9. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0272-9.PubMedUsed to support: 16-week double-blind RCT in 44 adults with DSM-5 OCD: NAC 3 g/day did not significantly change YBOCS total score vs placebo (p = 0.39; per-protocol p = 0.15); the compulsions subscale favored NAC at week 12 but not week 16; responders were 20% on NAC vs 27% on placebo; heartburn was more common with NAC.
  7. Tardiolo G, Bramanti P, Mazzon E. Overview on the Effects of N-Acetylcysteine in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Molecules. 2018;23(12):3305. doi: 10.3390/molecules23123305.PubMedUsed to support: Narrative review: NAC is a glutathione precursor with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity; the review covers its proposed use in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease, neuropathic pain and stroke.
  8. Wang Y, Kong Y, Zhao HY, Zhang YY, Wang YZ, Xu LP, Zhang XH, Liu KY, Huang XJ. Prophylactic NAC promoted hematopoietic reconstitution by improving endothelial cells after haploidentical HSCT: a phase 3, open-label randomized trial. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02338-9.PubMedUsed to support: Phase 3 open-label RCT in haploidentical stem cell transplant recipients aged 15 to 60 with acute leukemia: 120 high-risk patients were randomized 2 to 1 to oral NAC prophylaxis (400 mg three times daily) or none. Poor graft function or prolonged thrombocytopenia at day 60 was 7.5% vs 22.5% (hazard ratio 0.317, P = 0.021); NAC reduced reactive oxygen species in marrow cells; serious infections were 24% vs 25%.
  9. Tse HN, Raiteri L, Wong KY, Yee KS, Ng LY, Wai KY, Loo CK, Chan MH. High-dose N-acetylcysteine in stable COPD: the 1-year, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled HIACE study. Chest. 2013;144(1):106-118. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2357.PubMedUsed to support: HIACE: 1-year double-blind RCT in 120 patients aged 50 to 80 with stable COPD at a Hong Kong hospital, NAC 600 mg twice daily: improved small airway flow (P = .037) and forced oscillation measures, and fewer exacerbations (0.96 vs 1.71 per year, P = .019); no difference in breathlessness, quality of life or 6-minute walk. One author is affiliated with Zambon, an NAC manufacturer.
  10. Ciftci H, Verit A, Savas M, Yeni E, Erel O. Effects of N-acetylcysteine on semen parameters and oxidative/antioxidant status. Urology. 2009;74(1):73-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.02.034.PubMedUsed to support: Randomized placebo-controlled trial in 120 men with idiopathic infertility, oral NAC 600 mg/day for 3 months: semen volume, motility and viscosity improved, serum total antioxidant capacity rose and total peroxide and oxidative stress index fell vs control; sperm number and morphology did not change.
  11. Thakker D, Raval A, Patel I, Walia R. N-acetylcysteine for polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2015;2015:817849. doi: 10.1155/2015/817849.PubMedUsed to support: Systematic review and meta-analysis of eight randomized trials in 910 women with polycystic ovary syndrome: NAC gave higher odds of ovulation, pregnancy and live birth than placebo but lower odds of ovulation and pregnancy than metformin, with no significant change in miscarriage, menstrual regulation, body mass index, testosterone or insulin. Several studies had a high risk of bias, and the authors call for confirmation in well-designed trials.
  12. Poole P, Sathananthan K, Fortescue R. Mucolytic agents versus placebo for chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;5(5):CD001287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001287.pub6.PubMedUsed to support: Cochrane review of 38 trials (10,377 participants) of oral mucolytics, including NAC, carbocysteine, erdosteine and ambroxol, in chronic bronchitis or COPD: people on mucolytics were more likely to stay exacerbation-free (Peto OR 1.73; number needed to treat 8 over about 9 months; moderate certainty), with little effect on lung function or quality of life. Newer and longer studies showed smaller benefits, and heterogeneity was high.
  13. Horowitz JD, Henry CA, Syrjanen ML, Louis WJ, Fish RD, Smith TW, Antman EM. Combined use of nitroglycerin and N-acetylcysteine in the management of unstable angina pectoris. Circulation. 1988;77(4):787-94. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.77.4.787.PubMedUsed to support: Double-blind trial in 46 patients with severe unstable angina: intravenous nitroglycerin plus intravenous NAC caused symptomatic hypotension in 7 patients vs 0 with nitroglycerin alone. Earlier human studies had shown NAC potentiates nitroglycerin's vasodilator effects. Basis for the nitrate interaction caution.
  14. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Policy Regarding N-acetyl-L-cysteine: Guidance for Industry. FDA Guidance Document. 2022;Issued August 2022..SourceUsed to support: Not PubMed-indexed; FDA guidance. States NAC was approved as a new drug on September 14, 1963 and is excluded from the dietary supplement definition, and that, unless safety concerns are identified, FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion for NAC products labeled as dietary supplements until it completes rulemaking to allow NAC in supplements or denies the pending citizen petition.